Archived Immoral Attack Forums

Killing 1.1 bil troops and losing means they had over 20.2 bil troops

With only 13/14 bil networth that's impossible to have that many troops

I looked at that attack and you barely failed at 4.something percent (Floored to 4%) do remember riflemen only count for .8 networth so a kingdom devoted to all riflemen with a very high kingmanship in the case of drakius requires fewer peons for credit gains while you can dump all thats not needed for credits into riflemen giving you a lower looking networth with a large attack. I also double checked the script, all was fine.

Also at that time defense wasnt tier 1'd if they couldnt pay their troops like it is now. So essentially almost their entire population could have been Riflemen if done "right"

lets visit this one more time

drakius had

Drakius (land)431,242,579 (networth)17,296,410,430


ok 431,242,579 (land) X 15 (multiplier for networth) = 6,468,638,685 (networth)

17,296,410,430 (networth)- 6,468,638,68(networth) = 10,827,771,745(networth)

10,827,771,745 / .8 (all riflemen no knights and no peons) = 13,534,714,681 riflemen

5% of 13,534,714,681 = 676,735,734

so i had to kill atleast 676,735,734 of his troops to win.

I killed 985 mil (give or take a million i took a screenshot on my phone but fucked it up) and i still lost. and lost all of my 4 billion troops i sent. and he was not "LOW" for me

I also attacked drak three times. Each sending 2 bil (except one of the time). The first attack 2 bil each troop. I lost 4 bil he lost less then 1 bil.

Second attack I sent another 4 bil. Again I lost all and he lost a little over 1 bil if I remember right

Last attack I sent 5 bil total troops. Still lost 99.99% while he lpst like 1.3 bil.

And we are fighting on the same.tier. so no debuffs are in place

How?? Lol

an attack i finally won...


you killed 1,149,295,775 of the enemy troops. You lost 2,483,208,099 Riflemen and 2,483,208,099 Knights your army and land is expected to be settled in 15min.

it takes 5 bil troops to kill 1.1 bil of his when he is not "low"????

narfly has attacked Drakius of Demons Of Death earning the guild 5,112,812 Guild War Points.

also he was not labeled as low but i only recieved the 10% instead of the full amount

As I have showed and even copied and pasted the code for your viewing the % rates are not being calculated wrong I've explained and showed that a dozen times after each time you say its not... It is...

Please refer to the /ann on the maximum gains for Guild War Points.

And yes it took that many your sending 5b troops to attack a fortified position that has a hell of alot more troops than your 5b, you will take heavy losses. Lets just say you barely hit 5% as as you said this was your first win against them all others failed. Your 5b troops are running into 20b of his, so how can 20b troops fortified in their castle not kill 5b of your troops out in the open on a offensive?

Also are you failing to bring into the equation that drak has higher kingmanship than you so while his troops are fighting at tier 3 yours are fighting at tier 2?

I'm not sure your understanding the percent levels as many times as I have explained them to you, just because you win doesnt mean thats exactly 5% those numbers on a win can be anywhere from 5% on up. They arent exact static numbers and I'm not sure your understanding this. Please stop reporting war waging and your belief the numbers are wrong I have gone as far as copying and pasting the code to the public in multiple occasions to prove the numbers are correct and how they work. These max percents and what not only hit AFTER the fact they have been reached and dont revive troops to make them exactly 12% if I kill 30% in one round will 30% is dead and the rounds are haulted.

Nothing was wrong in your attack at all....